ASTM's Board of Directors adopted plans, in the fall of 2004, to launch the Interlaboratory Study Program (ILS) as part of their continuing pursuit of excellence in standards development. Responding to the need for standards in the marketplace to be of known and documented quality, a commitment was made to fund the development of the ILS Program. This commitment means that ASTM has been able to assist those technical committees for which the prospect of implementing an interlaboratory study was either administratively daunting or financially impossible. The ultimate goal is to enhance the quality of ASTM standard test methods by aiding the Technical Committees as they develop Precision Statements backed by high quality laboratory data.
In order to support the committees in their efforts to produce precision statements for their test methods, so as to incorporate at least a repeatability statement, the ILS Program is available to assist with the following areas:
Once a Work Item has been registered (instructions here), new programs should be registered through the Interlaboratory Study (ILS) link in the My Tools section of the member's MyASTM page, available after logging into ASTM's website.
Additional Information: Ruggedness Testing; Pilot Testing
There are two measurements that serve to express precision in the evaluation of a standard test method. They are commonly referred to as "repeatability" and "reproducibility" and provide the boundaries between which precision exists.
Bias, on the other hand, is defined as a systematic error that contributes to the difference between the mean of a large number of test results and an accepted reference value. When included in a standard test method, this statement describes the bias and the methods utilized to provide corrected test results. It is important to remember that if an accepted reference value is not available, then the bias cannot be established. However, if the bias is unknown but the direction or bounds of the bias can be estimated, this information should be included in the bias statement.
As precision and bias are mandatory sections of an ASTM standard test method (per Section A.21 Form and Style for ASTM Standards), the utmost care should be taken to ensure that the final data, as well as the steps that were taken to generate the data, are as precise and accurate as possible. A standard test method that is incapable of doing what it purports can be misleading. Precision and bias statements strengthen the perceived validity of the standard test method and provide the user of the document with the added confidence of knowing that the standard test method has been laboratory tested.
Templates:
Precision and Bias Template
Repeatability Precision Template
ASTM has published approximately 6000 test methods to date, with more being approved every day. The backbone of many of these standard test methods is a comprehensive interlaboratory study that supports the Precision and Bias statement. When an interlaboratory study is completed, it is very important to document the details in a research report. A research report should contain a list of participating laboratories, description of samples, a copy of the laboratory instructions, the equipment/apparatus used, a copy of the raw data, a statistical summary and a copy of the precision and bias statement. The ASTM Form and Style Manual (Section A29.1) states, "Where numerical data have been generated to establish the precision and bias of a test method, a research report is required". To this end, we have developed a consistent format in the ASTM Research Report Template for you to use.
The published standard test method will include the research report number in a footnote to the Precision and Bias section. To obtain a copy of a research report, contact ASTM Customer Service by phone at 610-832-9585 (8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Eastern U.S. Standard Time, Monday through Friday) or by email at service@astm.org.
For assistance with research reports, please contact researchreports@astm.org.